意甲裁判指派员罗基:取消弗拉霍维奇点球的决定是正确的(罗基:撤销弗拉霍维奇点球判罚是正确的决定)
栏目:球探比分 发布时间:2026-01-19

Explaining VAR and Penalty Cancellation

I can explain how VAR cancels penalties for situations like offensive fouls, handballs, offside, or minimal contact. They mentioned a statement from Rocchi about the cancellation being correct, so maybe I should ask if they want a translation or a summary. It’s reasonable to check if they need a quick context or an analysis of the Laws of the Game related to penalties. I could also help find a video if they give more details!

你是想要这条消息的背景与判罚依据,还是需要翻译/摘要?

nable

如果想快速理解“取消点球为何可能正确”,按比赛规则常见的推翻理由有:

ul

  • 进攻方先犯规:拉拽、推人、手部犯规在先;
  • 越位介入:判罚前的攻方越位参与导致进球机会无效;
  • 手球判定:进攻方手球在先或非自然扩大范围;
  • 接触不足/模拟:VAR回放显示接触轻微且不足以构成犯规;
  • 犯规地点在禁区外:原判点球改任意球;
  • 明显事实错误:比如误判犯规对象或误读情景。

流程上,VAR仅在“明显且显著错误/严重遗漏”时建议复核;主裁到场边看回放(OFR)后可改判。作为意甲裁判负责人,罗基赛后点评通常是基于这些标准来背书改判。

如果你能告诉我是哪个比赛、哪分钟的判罚(或给个链接),我可以按该回合逐点对照规则解释罗基为何说“改判正确”。

li